Ross v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALKER, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from a conviction for the felony offense of Aggravated Robbery. Appellant was found “guilty” by a jury but elected to have the trial court assess punishment. Appellant pleaded “true” to two enhancement allegations which raised his punishment exposure to that of an habitual offender. The trial court assessed appellant thirty (30) years’ confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant requests our consideration of four points of error, viz:
Point 1: The evidence is insufficient to support the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Sharp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Van Zandt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1996
- Lopez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
- Hopkins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1994
- Jaime Zamora Corral v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2004
- Michael Lopez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.