Legal Opinion

Kaminisky v. Trantham

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 9, 1895PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Before Gary, J., Columbia, January, 14,1895. Motion at chambers for rule to show cause why purchaser had not complied with bid. Rule issued, resale' ordered, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

The proceeding out of which this appeal grows is based upon an action for the foreclosure of a mortgage, brought by the plaintiff, Hyman Kaminisky, as the assignee of John R. Falls, to whom the mortgage was given by the defendant, W. D. Trantham. Decree for foreclosure was rendered by the Honorable James Aldrich, *9presiding Judge, at the June, 1894, term of the Court of Common Pleas for Kershaw County, he finding that there was due the sum of $1,213.50, with interest from date of said decree (which was filed 27th July, 1894), and…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Steele v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API