Legal Opinion

Cevallos v. Rideout

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 9, 2009No. 4D08-3042PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMay, J.

In an odd twist of an old rebuttable presumption, we are asked to determine if the trial court correctly applied the presumption of negligence against a rear-driver plaintiff in a rear-end collision to direct a verdict for the lead-driver defendant. The plaintiff argues that the trial court erred in its application of the presumption in directing the verdict. We disagree and affirm.

The accident occurred when a non-party attempted to avoid a disabled vehicle on the downhill slope of an overpass. Two non-party vehicles were able to avoid colliding with the disabled vehicle and each other. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gulle v. BoggsSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
  2. Clampitt v. DJ Spencer SalesSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  3. Eppler v. Tarmac America, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2000
  4. Pierce v. Progressive American Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  5. Jefferies v. Amery Leasing, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Birge v. CharronSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
  2. Jiminez v. FacconeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  3. Cevallos v. RideoutSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
  4. Charron v. BirgeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  5. Shirey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API