Legal Opinion

Markham v. Hipke

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1919PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from orders of the circuit court for Milwaukee county: E. T. Fairchild, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtWinslow, C. J.

The action is for malpractice. The defendant, a physician, was being examined adversely before trial, under sec. 4096, Stats., and refused to disclose information received by him while treating the plaintiff as a patient and which was necessary to enable him to prescribe, although the plaintiff expressly waived the statutory privilege of secrecy and he was ordered to answer by the court. For this refusal he was adjudged guilty of contempt, and appeals.

The sole question presented is whether the privilege granted by sec. 4075, Stats., is the privilege of the patient or of the physician. We…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boyle v. Northwestern Mutual Relief Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Casson v. SchoenfeldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
  3. McGinty v. Brotherhood of Railway TrainmenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Canning v. Chicago & Milwaukee Electric Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Angerstein v. Milwaukee Monument Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API