Legal Opinion

Sanchez v. Pena

District Court, D. New Mexico

Decided July 28, 1998No. 98-0336 M/RLP CIVILPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER

MECHEM, Senior District Judge.

This matter comes on for consideration on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Complaint [# 6-1]. Having fully considered the pleadings, the parties’ arguments, and the applicable law, I find that the motion is well taken and should be GRANTED.

BACKGROUND FACTS

After Defendants moved to dismiss Plaintiffs’ original complaint, Plaintiffs amended their complaint and timely responded to the motion. Defendants directed their reply to the amended complaint, thus I will consider the motion in light of the amended complaint. Cf. Patton Elec. Co. v.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of BellwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
National Anti-Hunger Coalition v. Executive Committee of the President's Private Sector Survey on Cost ControlCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
Joan B. Claybrook v. Rodney E. Slater, Administrator, Federal Highway AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

Center for Law & Education v. United States Department of EducationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
Colestock v. DeJoyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025