Legal Opinion

Adams v. McKay

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1925No. Docket No. 27PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Certiorari to the department of labor and industry. Paul Baker and Archie McKay, trading as Baker & McKay, became subject to the provisions of the workmen’s compensation act (Comp. Laws Supp. 1922, § 5428) on or about March 16, 1923. The employer’s acceptance under the act is signed “Baker & McKay, Archie McKay, Partner, Paul Baker, Partner.” Defendant insurer carried the risk. The application for the policy is signed “Baker & McKay, Applicant. Per Archie McKay, Paul Baker.” The policy runs to Baker & McKay. It, among other things, provides:

“No assignment of interest under this policy shall…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cashin v. PliterMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Traders' & General Ins. Co. v. EmmertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  2. Tri-State Casualty Ins. Co. v. BowenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Travelers Ins. Co. v. DudleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Sechler v. PastoreSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  5. Capatanos v. Aero RestaurantMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API