Adams v. McKay
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
Certiorari to the department of labor and industry. Paul Baker and Archie McKay, trading as Baker & McKay, became subject to the provisions of the workmen’s compensation act (Comp. Laws Supp. 1922, § 5428) on or about March 16, 1923. The employer’s acceptance under the act is signed “Baker & McKay, Archie McKay, Partner, Paul Baker, Partner.” Defendant insurer carried the risk. The application for the policy is signed “Baker & McKay, Applicant. Per Archie McKay, Paul Baker.” The policy runs to Baker & McKay. It, among other things, provides:
“No assignment of interest under this policy shall…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cashin v. PliterMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by5 opinions
- Traders' & General Ins. Co. v. EmmertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Tri-State Casualty Ins. Co. v. BowenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Travelers Ins. Co. v. DudleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1943
- Sechler v. PastoreSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
- Capatanos v. Aero RestaurantMichigan Supreme Court · 1939