Legal Opinion
In re Tishauna Patricia N.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 22, 2009PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The mother’s appeal from the order denying her motion to reinstate visitation with the subject children has been rendered academic in light of a subsequent order of the Family Court reinstating her visitation with the subject children and, *1120therefore, must be dismissed (see Pollack v Pollack, 56 AD3d 637, 637-638 [2008]; Matter of Damian M., 41 AD3d 600 [2007]; People ex rel A.E.F. v K.T.L., 40 AD3d 894, 895 [2007]).
The mother’s contention that the Family Court improvidently exercised its discretion in approving a permanency goal of placement for adoption for the subject children is not…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People ex rel. A.E.F. v. K.T.L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by9 opinions
- Saldivar v. CabreraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re Joseph A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re Anthony B.-A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Padin v. PadinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Greenidge v. HenryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.