Legal Opinion

People v. Raines

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 22, 1944No. Crim. 3817Published

1Opinion of the Court

66 Cal.App.2d 960 (1944)

THE PEOPLE, Respondent,

v.

CECIL L. RAINES, Appellant.

Crim. No. 3817.

California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Two.

Nov. 22, 1944.

Alfred A. Grant for Appellant.

Robert W. Kenny, Attorney General, and Walter L. Bowers, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent.

McCOMB, J.

From an order denying defendant's motion for a new trial after conviction of grand theft, defendant appeals.

The evidence being viewed in the light most favorable to the People (respondent), and pursuant to the rules set forth in People v. Pianezzi, 42 Cal.App.2d 270, 277 [108 P.2d 685], the essential…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. People v. DarcyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. People v. BryantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. People v. PianezziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API