Perreira v. State
Supreme Court of Colorado
1DissentVollack, Justice
I dissent from the majority opinion because I would hold as a matter of law that Dr. Anders and the state did not owe a legal duty to Officer Perreira under these circumstances. While I do not agree entirely with the court of appeals’ analysis, I would affirm the court of appeals’ conclusion that “the trial court erred in finding that the State had a legal duty to Officer Perreira and his survivors.” Perreira v. State, 738 P.2d 4, 6 (Colo.App.1986).
I
Negligent Release
The plaintiff’s claim is not that Dr. An-ders negligently failed to warn Officer Per-reira, or police officers in general, of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Thompson v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Durflinger v. ArtilesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- Taco Bell, Inc. v. LannonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.