Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

Decided March 22, 2012No. Docket No. 13687-11LUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

ALFRED Q. CAMPBELL III, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Campbell v. Comm'r

Docket No. 13687-11L

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 2012-82; 2012 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 82; 103 T.C.M. (CCH) 1446;

March 22, 2012, Filed

Alfred Q. Campbell III, Pro se.

Martha Jane Weber, for respondent.

WELLS, Judge.

WELLS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WELLS, Judge: This case is before the Court on respondent's motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 121 and to impose a penalty pursuant to section 6673. 1 The issues we have been asked to decide are: (1) whether petitioner is precluded from contesting his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sego v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
  2. Sundstrand Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  3. Sundstrand Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
  4. Naftel v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
  5. Bond v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API