Legal Opinion

State v. Vasquez

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 27, 2001No. 19493-1-IIIPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

— Collateral estoppel precludes relitigation of an issue already decided. The doctrine reflects our legal system’s emphasis on finality. State v. Barnes, 85 Wn. App. 638, 652-53, 932 P.2d 669 (1997). Here, a Department of licensing hearing officer concluded that a Quincy police sergeant did not have probable cause to stop Ramiro Vasquez for speeding. Mr. Vasquez was charged with driving while under the influence and possession of cocaine *313after the officer searched him incident to the arrest.

The primary question before us is whether the Department of Licensing hearing officer’s conclusion that…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. TerrovonaWashington Supreme Court · 1986

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Christensen v. Grant County Hospital District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. TiliWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. TiliWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. VasquezWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. VasquezWashington Supreme Court · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API