Thomas v. Lomax
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.
1. From a reading of the petition it cannot be determined whether the plaintiff was seeking to show breach of an express or an implied contract. However, the plaintiff’s counsel, upon inquiry of the court, twice stated that the plaintiff’s; action was based upon an express contract. • Relying on these statements, both the court and the defendant’s counsel tried the case on that theory and the plaintiff is bound by such election.
2. Having taken the position in judicio that her action was on the theory of an express contract, the plaintiff is limited to-an action on an express contract.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McInerney v. Detroit Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co. v. Henderson Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- Douglas v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
3Cited by10 opinions
- Computer Shoppe, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
- Stanley Smith & Sons v. Limestone CollegeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- The Hinesville Bank v. Pony Express Courier Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Fountain v. TidwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- Dolan v. McQuaideCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.