Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Ortiz
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 5, 2001PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
¶ 1 Alberto Ortiz appeals from the judgment of sentence entered following his conviction of Possession of a Controlled Substance, Possession with Intent to Deliver a Controlled Substance, Possession of Drug Paraphernalia, and Driving while Operating Privilege Revoked or Suspended See 35 P.S. § 780-113(a)(16), (30), (32), 75 Pa.C.S. § 1543(b) (respectively). Ortiz contends that the suppression court erred in refusing to suppress drug evidence discovered during a search of his car and that there was insufficient evidence to support the verdict. After study, we conclude that the court erred in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Commonwealth v. StricklerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. FreemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. PerrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. KempSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- In the Int. of: A.A., a Minor Appeal of: A.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. KeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. MaloneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.