Legal Opinion
United States v. I.I. Ozar Larry J. Bridges Sherman W. Dreiseszun
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 25, 1995No. 94-2740PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOKEN, Circuit Judge.
This is an interlocutory appeal in a bid-rigging prosecution in which the government proposes to introduce evidence obtained by electronic surveillance. The district court suppressed that evidence on three grounds: because the government violated Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978), when it obtained an order authorizing electronic surveillance with an affidavit that contained reckless misstatements and omissions; because the probable cause determination was based upon stale information; and because the FBI did not minimize the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Massachusetts v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Willie H. DennisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Murray v. LeneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- State v. LillyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
- United States v. Micah J. GourdeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Bahman Mansoori, Mark Cox, Mohammad Mansoori, Kenneth Choice, and Terry YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- John Alvin Payne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.