Legal Opinion

State v. Crowell

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1989No. 88-0040-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShirley S. Abrahamson, J.

This appeal from a judgment of conviction of the Circuit Court for Kenosha County, Bruce E. Schroeder, Circuit Judge, comes before this court on certification from the court of appeals. Sec. 809.61, Stats. 1987-88.

The court of appeals certified the following question to this court: “Whether sec. 972.15, Stats., prohibits the introduction at trial of statements contained in a presentence report prepared pursuant to a guilty plea that was subsequently withdrawn.” We hold that it does. We therefore conclude that the circuit court erred when it allowed the state to introduce at a trial. conducted…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. DyessWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State Ex Rel. Goodchild v. BurkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Gregg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Rosado v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. GreveWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  3. State v. TaylorWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. WeberCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  5. State v. MeltonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API