Legal Opinion

Murray v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 2, 1980No. 79-1839PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Section 39.111(6)(d), Florida Statutes (1979), requires that a trial court, when imposing adult sanctions on a juvenile convicted of a crime, make findings of fact and set forth reasons showing those sanctions to be in conformity with the criteria of Section 39.111(6)(c). The record here reveals that the trial judge failed to refer to all of the six criteria mentioned in that section when he sentenced appellant.

We affirm, the judgment of the trial court, but vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing pursuant to Section 39.-111(6). See Proctor v. State, 373 So.2d 450 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979);…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  2. Proctor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  2. G. D. W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Glenn v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. Upshaw v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Christy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API