Davis v. State

CRENSHAW, Judge.

Nathan Davis appeals his judgment and sentences for burglary of a conveyance with a battery while armed with a firearm and robbery with a firearm. We affirm Davis’s judgment and sentences without comment. However, we conclude that the trial court was divested of its jurisdiction to enter a nunc pro tunc order adjudicating Davis competent to proceed at trial because the trial court entered the order after Davis filed his notice of appeal.

“The law is well established that, once an appeal is filed, the trial court loses jurisdiction with regard to the matter which is the subject…