Legal Opinion
Hasegawa v. Hasegawa
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 26, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to set aside a conveyance as fraudulent, the defendants Sam Suzuki, Satoko Suzuki, Tomonari Nomura, and Nomura Suzuki Properties, Ltd., appeal, as limited by their brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Shapiro, J.), dated November 30, 1999, which, inter alia, granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was to hold the individual appellants in civil contempt, imposed a sanction upon each individual appellant in the sum of $10,000, and, sua sponte, awarded the receiver, Jack A. Adesso, an attorney’s fee in the sum of $9,800.
Ordered…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Goldsmith v. GoldsmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Muller v. MullerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Barkan v. BarkanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Capone v. Matteo Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Garbitelli v. BroylesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by3 opinions
- Yuko Ito v. SuzukiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Vastwin Investments, Ltd. v. Aquarius Media Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Home Surplus of Brooklyn, Inc. v. Home Surplus, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004