Eidson v. State

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

Marion Albert Eidson appeals, following a jury trial, his convictions of two counts of burglary, two counts of armed robbery, and two counts of kidnapping. Eidson contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion for directed verdict of acquittal, because the testimony of his alleged accomplice was not corroborated. Because we find there were sufficient corroborating facts and circumstances, we affirm.

On appeal from a criminal conviction,

we view the evidence in a light most favorable to support the verdict, and an appellant no longer enjoys the presumption…