Hasty Mercantile Co. v. Bryant
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClabksoN, J.
There is only a single legal question involved in this case: Do the allegations of the complaint, on a trial of this cause, if proven to be true, constitute a good cause of action and entitle plaintiff to recover of the defendant? We are of the opinion that the allegations in the complaint constitute a good cause of action.
The defendant relies on the statute of frauds, as follows: “No action shall, be brought whereby to charge an executor, administrator or collector upon a special promise to answer out of his own estate or to charge any defendant upon a special promise to answer the debt,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Voorhees v. Porter.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Whitehurst v. . HymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- Threadgill v. . McLendonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
- Rush v. McPhersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Mason v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Garren v. . YoungbloodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Novelty Co. v. . AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Jennings v. . KeelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Hickory Novelty Co. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Dillard ex rel. Walker v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.