Legal Opinion

Hasty Mercantile Co. v. Bryant

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 5, 1923PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClabksoN, J.

There is only a single legal question involved in this case: Do the allegations of the complaint, on a trial of this cause, if proven to be true, constitute a good cause of action and entitle plaintiff to recover of the defendant? We are of the opinion that the allegations in the complaint constitute a good cause of action.

The defendant relies on the statute of frauds, as follows: “No action shall, be brought whereby to charge an executor, administrator or collector upon a special promise to answer out of his own estate or to charge any defendant upon a special promise to answer the debt,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Voorhees v. Porter.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Whitehurst v. . HymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  3. Threadgill v. . McLendonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  4. Rush v. McPhersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  5. Mason v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Garren v. . YoungbloodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. Novelty Co. v. . AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Jennings v. . KeelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. Hickory Novelty Co. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. Dillard ex rel. Walker v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API