Legal Opinion

Billings Bench Water Ass'n v. Yellowstone County

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1924No. 5,441PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Galen

From the allegations of plaintiff’s amended complaint it appears that the plaintiff is a Montana corporation, and that it owns and operates a main irrigation canal some twenty miles in length, together with lateral ditches, headgates and other devices required for the irrigation and reclamation of between 23,000 and 24,000 acres of land in Yellowstone county. The ■ main canal is supplied with water from the Yellowstone River, taken out southerly from the town of Laurel, running thence in a northeasterly direction toward and past the city of Billings. The stockholders of the plaintiff…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stadler v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Shapard v. City of MissoulaMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Power v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Cooper v. City of BozemanMontana Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Johnston v. City of HardinMontana Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Scilley v. Red Lodge-Rosebud Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Roosevelt CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  3. State Ex Rel. Malott v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Wood v. City of KalispellMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Buckley v. WordalMontana Supreme Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API