Gambling v. . Haight
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
This action and that brought to enforce the mechanics' lien are not for the same cause. Neither are the parties the same, nor would the same evidence sustain both. The notes sued upon, although given to secure the payment of a portion of the same debt covered by the mechanics' lien, were given upon an independent consideration, and are collateral to the principal obligation under the agreement between the owner of the building and the principal contractor. The primary obligation founded upon the original agreement, including the statutory liability under the mechanics' lien law, and the…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Sweet v. Montpelier Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Cotner v. Lon Jacobs Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Skakandy v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1946
- Heidelbach v. National Park BankNew York Supreme Court · 1895
- Ohio Public Service Co. v. SharkeyOhio Supreme Court · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.