Legal Opinion

Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific Railroad v. Elmore

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 15, 1894No. 1296Published

R. W. Richardson, J. PPBAL from the Fifth District Court, Parish of Ouachita.

1Opinion

On Application eor Rehearing.

Miller, J.

The earnestness of the argument for a rehearing in this case has prompted us to a careful re-examination and, if our *1243conclusions prove disappointing to the defendants, we trust they will be accepted as the result of a diligent effort on our part to give to the controversy, previous phases of which have been before us, our best attention.

"When defendants, sued for land, hold by different titles, they can not, as a general rule, be joined because their defences,, necessarily, are different. In this case the defendants exhibit no title whatever, common or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pearce v. FrantumSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840
  2. Gaines v. New OrleansU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana · 1871
  3. Gaines v. AgnellyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Louisiana · 1872

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API