State v. Romero (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.
*469{¶ 1} In this appeal, we address the standard for ruling on a criminal defendant's motion to withdraw a guilty plea when the motion is based on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel arising from an attorney's alleged failure to advise his noncitizen client of the immigration consequences of entering the plea.
{¶ 2} Appellee, Carlos Romero, a lawful permanent resident of the United States, has been ordered to appear for deportation proceedings as a result of entering guilty pleas to charges of drug trafficking and possession. Romero seeks to withdraw his guilty pleas based on a claim of…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment · Donnelly; Concurring in the judgment · Stewart.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- State v. D-BeyOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- State v. Brinkman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. EasterlingOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. Bozso (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. AtahiyaOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.