Thompson v. Chemical Bank
Civil Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the CourtAllen Murray Myers, J.
In this proceeding pursuant to section 217-a of the Judiciary Law, we are faced with the question of whether a bank, through its salaried in-house counsel, may recover a judgment for attorney’s fees as provided for in its consumer loan agreements in the event that the bank is forced to institute suit to collect an unpaid loan from a defaulting debtor.
The parties agree that section 108 of the Banking Law provides the answer. The pertinent provisions of section 108 are subdivisions 4 (par [c], cl [iii]) and 5 (par [e], cl [iii]). They *723are almost identical and provide as follows: "The maximum…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Vee Bee Service Co. v. Household Finance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- People v. CubiottiRochester City Court · 1956
- People v. NadlerNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1955
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mead v. First Trust & Deposit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- CHASE BANK USA v. StaffenbergNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- National Commercial Bank & Trust Co v. Farina's Market, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1978
- Mead v. First Trust & Deposit Co.New York Supreme Court · 1977
- PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.