Legal Opinion
Nicastro v. Clinton
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 28, 1995No. Civ. A. No. 94-0590 PLFPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
William M. Nicastro and Roy D. Little are federal prison inmates housed at the United States Penitentiary in White Deer, Pennsylvania, who have brought a claim under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., (“FLSA”) against the Executive Directors of Federal Prison Industries (“FPI”), among others.1
*1129FPI was created to provide work to inmates confined in federal institutions. 28 C.F.R. § 345.10 (1994). Its statutory mandate limits FPI to providing products to federal penal and correctional institutions and to other federal departments and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Mitchell v. Robert DeMario Jewelry, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Louis Carter v. Dutchess Community CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Poblete v. U.S. Marshals ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Super v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2022