Legal Opinion

Downing v. Elliott

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 18, 1902PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

The plaintiff is engaged in the ice business and is the owner of a pond in Brighton from which he cuts ice for family and wholesale trade. The defendant is the owner of a greenhouse near the pond and heated by steam. Prior to the bringing of the bill he had used soft coal. And the bill alleges that smoke, dust, soot and cinders were thereby deposited in the plaintiff’s pond and the ice rendered unfit for use. The prayer of the bill is, that the defendant may be restrained from using soft coal or other fuel that will interfere with or injure the property or business of the plaintiff, and for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boston Ferrule Co. v. HillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  2. Rogers v. ElliottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Smith v. New England Aircraft Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  2. Fortier v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. Strachan v. Beacon Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  4. Wade v. MillerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  5. Bove v. Donner-Hanna Coke Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API