Legal Opinion

Strickland v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided August 17, 1995No. 01-94-00722-CRPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MIRABAL, Justice.

After the trial court overruled his motion to suppress, appellant Arney Lee Strickland pled guilty, pursuant to a plea agreement, to possession of a controlled substance. The trial court assessed punishment at five-years deferred adjudication probation, and a $500.00 fine. We affirm.

In four points of error, appellant asserts the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suppress evidence allegedly obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution; article I, section 9 of the Texas Constitution; and the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Maddox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. Derrow, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998
  2. State v. WondersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  3. Villareal v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  4. Thomas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  5. State v. Fecci, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API