Legal Opinion

Reed v. Slaughter

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 9, 1988PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We have determined to affirm, without extended discussion, the judgment below. The case presents only what we might ordinarily call a situation not requiring our appellate supervision. Mahony v. Danis, 95 N.J. 50 (1983).

This case concerns not the power of government to protect the public fisc from unworthy recipients of welfare, but rather the validity of a regulation’s interpretation, concurred in by the agency primarily responsible for the implementation of the welfare program. The facts are set forth in the reported opinion of the Law Division, 213 N.J.Super. 123, 124-26 (1986). That…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mahony v. DanisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  2. Reed v. SlaughterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  3. Reed v. SlaughterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Childs v. Essex County Division of WelfareNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API