Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Rios

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 30, 1993No. 10573; 10574Published

1ConcurrenceO’Connell, J.

I concur with the result reached by the majority but write separately to express my opinion on the importance of compliance with Practice Book § 4059.1

The significance of § 4059 can best be appreciated if considered in historical perspective. Shortly after the dawn of Connecticut appellate jurisprudence, a complicated system of establishing facts for appellate review began to evolve. The system ultimately grew to include requests to the trial court for a finding of facts, the appellant’s draft findings, the appellee’s counter draft findings, the court’s findings, motions to correct the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Walton v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Elliott v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
  3. Manchester v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  4. Zak v. WeismanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API