Legal Opinion
Cole Manufacturing Co. v. Collier
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided June 4, 1892PublishedCited by 10 opinions
FROM SHELBY. Appeal from Chancery Court of Shelby County. "W. D. Beard, Ch.
1Opinion of the Court
L. Lehman, Sp. J.
The bill in this cause was preferred by the complainant, a corporation, to recover from the defendant, W. A. Collier, the price and value of labor and material performed and furnished in the construction of a building, under a written agreement entered into between them on November 14, 1889, the portion of which applicable to the question raised is as follows:
“It is further agreed that in case any difference should arise between the said Collier and the Cole Manufacturing Company as to the quality of work or materials, or any other question that may ai’ise under this…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hamilton v. Liverpool, London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Hamilton v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- The ExcelsiorSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
3Cited by10 opinions
- Goldberg v. Provident Washington InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Headley v. &198tna Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Adams v. HaiglerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Meirowsky v. PhippsTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
- Local 19, Warehouse, Processing & Distributive Workers Union v. Buckeye Cotton Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.