Legal Opinion

Pfenning v. Department of Employment & Training

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 27, 1989No. 87-397PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

This appeal from a decision of the Vermont Employment Security Board (Board) comes here a second time, following our partial reversal and remand in Pfenning v. Department of Employment & Training, 147 Vt. 533, 522 A.2d 743 (1986) (“Pfenning I”). We now affirm.

The facts are related in part in Pfenning I, which like the present case concerned claimants’ eligibility for benefits during a lockout by their employer from November 4, 1983 to January 15, 1984. In that decision, we rejected claimants’ argument that a lockout was not a “labor dispute” within the meaning of 21 V.S.A. § 1344, the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Travis v. GrabiecIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Shell Oil Co. v. BrooksWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Trapeni v. Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  4. Ellis v. Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Vermont · 1975
  5. Whitcomb v. Department of Employment & TrainingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bouchard v. Department of Employment & TrainingSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  2. Boguszewski v. Commissioner of Department of Employment & TrainingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. Howard v. Department of Employment & TrainingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  4. Mary Duggan v. Dept. of Labor (Addison-Rutland Supervisory Union, Employer)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API