Legal Opinion

Harvey v. Maistrosky

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 9, 1959No. 1213PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALLEN, Chief Judge.

The appellant, as plaintiff below, brought an action against the Self Service Shoe Store, appellee here, for damages she claims by reason of sitting on a canvas stool or chair which collapsed while she was sitting thereon in the defendant’s store. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence, the lower court directed a verdict for the defendant-appellee. This appeal is from the final judgment entered for the defendant.

The lower court, in directing the verdict for the defendant, said:

“The Court: Gentlemen of the jury, the law permits the Court first to pass upon whether…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Budgen v. BradyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  2. Teare v. Local Union No. 295Supreme Court of Florida · 1957
  3. Hickory House v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  4. Robbins v. GraceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  5. Bryan v. LoftinSupreme Court of Florida · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hanft v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Maistrosky v. HarveyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  3. Schneider v. K. S. B. Realty & Investing Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  4. Gray Drugfair, Inc. v. HellerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Grand Union Co. v. DevlinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API