Legal Opinion

Byrne v. Ackerlund

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1987No. 52927-2Published

1DissentDore, J.

(dissenting) — The majority holds that Pauline Byrne cannot enforce certain liens on property awarded to her former husband, William Ackerlund, in a prior dissolution action. Instead, she must wait until Ackerlund chooses to sell the property, if he does, before she can recover the money due her pursuant to the terms of the decree. This decision is inconsistent and at odds with this court's prior *457decisions. I dissent.

Final Distribution of Property

At the time of divorce, the trial court is statutorily required to make a full and fair distribution of all property the divorcing couple brings to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Shaffer v. ShafferWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Byrne v. AckerlundCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API