Legal Opinion

Mulville v. Brown

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided May 26, 1941No. File No. 7492PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action for negligence brought by the plaintiff within a year from the date of the neglect complained of. The defendant's counterclaim for his damages was brought more than a year after the neglect of which he complains. The plaintiff has pleaded the statute of limitations to the counterclaim, to which the defendant has demurred. The question raised is, therefore, whether the defendant is saved from the operation of the statute because the plaintiff has brought his action within the required time.

Section 1680c of the 1935 Cumulative Supplement to the General Statutes states that "no…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Consolidated Motor Lines, Inc. v. M & M Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  2. Hewitt's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
  3. Harral v. LevertySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1882
  4. Davis v. Naugatuck Valley Crucible Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  5. Terill v. BeecherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1832

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nickerson v. MartinConnecticut Superior Court · 1976
  2. Jewett City Trust Co. v. GrayConnecticut Superior Court · 1977
  3. Jewett City Trust Co. v. GrayConnecticut Superior Court · 1977
  4. The Savings Bank, Rockville v. Wielgos, No. Cv 97-0065409 (Jun. 29, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API