Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Simon

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 11, 1999Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

O’HERN, J.,

concurring in Parts I, II, and IV-XII and dissenting in Parts III and XIII.

I concur in the opinion of the Court except with respect to Part III, in which the Court concludes that the trial court was not clearly erroneous in rejecting defendant’s application to withdraw his guilty plea. By posing the wrong question, the Court has reached the wrong conclusion. The real question is whether the trial court should have accepted the plea in the first place.

I

Rule 3:9-2 imposes a non-delegable duty on a court accepting a guilty plea to satisfy itself independently “that there is a factual…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Daniel Loconte v. Richard Dugger, Robert A. ButterworthCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  4. State v. KoedatichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  5. United States v. Frank E. ReadyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API