Legal Opinion

Harwood v. Ramsey

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 31, 1826PublishedCited by 1 opinion

in error. Writ of error to the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland county.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court, (Tirghman, C. J., not giving any opinion, in consequence of sickness and absence,) was delivered by

Rogers, J.

The Pennsylvania Agricultural and Manufacturing Bank, were the equitable owners of a house and lot in the borough of Carlisle, which had been occupied by them, in the necessary transaction of their business as a banking house. The stockholders having agreed, that the business of the bank should be wound up, and' having no further use for the house and lot, it was sold by *32the agents of the bank to the plaintiffs, Thomas and James Harwood. The bank, in part…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Van Buren v. WellsNew York Supreme Court · 1838

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API