Legal Opinion

Hill Estate Co. v. Whittlesey

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1899No. 3150PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Jefferson County. — Hon. James G. McClinton, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gordon, C. J.

In April, 1883, Mary Fowler, A. H. Tucker and Mary J. Tucker, the owners of the real estate hereinafter referred to, by their deed conveyed lots 1 and 3, in block 87 of the city of Port Townsend, in the then territory of Washington, unto the “Rev. John Adams Paddock, Bishop of Washington Territory, in trust for and for the use of the wardens, vestry and congregation of St. Paul’s parish of the Protestant Episcopal church at Port Townsend.” In October, 1888, James Jones, W. H. Whittlesey, A. H. Tucker, Charles Pink and Charles A. Dyer, *144execu…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mason v. MuncasterSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Smith v. AllenWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Cook v. TibbalsWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Beckwith v. McBride & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  5. Pennsylvania Mortgage Investment Co. v. GilbertWashington Supreme Court · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lyon v. HerbothWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Mady v. Holy Trinity Roman Catholic Polish ChurchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Lenz v. HardingWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Atkinson v. MelcherWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API