Legal Opinion

Pro Car Care, Inc. v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 17, 2005No. 0206-05835; A123448PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Plaintiff, an automotive repair shop, brought this action under ORS 30.701 against defendant, a customer, after she stopped payment on a check that she wrote to pay for work plaintiff had performed on her motor home. Defendant counterclaimed, alleging a violation of ORS 646.639, the Unfair Debt Collection Practices Act (UDCPA). The trial court ruled in favor of defendant on both the claim and counterclaim, awarding her $200 in damages on the counterclaim. In a supplemental judgment, the court also awarded defendant $8,000 in attorney fees for successfully defending against plaintiff’s claim…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Porter v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Ramsey v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Wescold, Inc. v. Logan International, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. Engelcke v. StoehslerOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Isom v. Portland General Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ballard v. City of AlbanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. J. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. Gordon v. RosenblumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. Thomas v. U.S. Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Laru Pereschica; Rafael Sandoval v. Hershner Hunter, LLP; Selco Community Credit UnionDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API