Legal Opinion

Camacho v. Garrett

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided January 5, 2023No. 3:23-cv-00001Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 * * * 6 CIRO CAMACHO, Case No. 3:23-cv-00001-MMD-CSD 7 Petitioner, ORDER v. 8 9 TIM GARRETT, et al., 10 Respondents. 11 12 Pro se Petitioner Ciro Camacho has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 13 under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF No. 1-1 (“Petition”).) This matter comes before the Court 14 on initial review under the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases (“Habeas Rules”) and 15 for consideration of Camacho’s motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 1-2). For the 16 reasons discussed below, the Court directs service of the Petition…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Lawrence v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Edgar M. Hendricks v. Daniel Vasquez, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Martin Valdez, Jr. v. W. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  5. Armando Sossa v. Ralph M. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API