Legal Opinion

Noxon v. Potts

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 7, 1938No. 4052; No. 4053Published

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

On December 2, 1937, counsel for appellants filed a motion for an order permitting the use of the transcript of record in consolidated appeals Nos. 3955, 3956, 3957, and 3958 (neither of appellants is a party in any of those appeals), on the hearing and in the consideration of the issues here involved.

*860It >is alleged in the motion-that Potts, the; appellee in each' of these interferences," Had been involved in eleven' .separate interferences in the Patent Office; that in some of those interferences, including those in the instant appeals, motions to dissolve were filed on the ground that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Olson v. PospeshilCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API