Legal Opinion

Barrow v. Hammond

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 12, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In two *497related paternity and child support proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act articles 4 and 5, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Foskey, J.), dated July 8, 2002, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Watson, H.E.), dated February 13, 2002, which, after a hearing, inter alia, imputed income to him for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The parties, Dorraine Barrow and Kenute E. Hammond, are the parents of two sons who were born out of wedlock…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hickland v. HicklandNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Fries v. Price-YablinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Brefka v. DobiesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Dodaro v. BeyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Haines v. HainesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Liles v. LilesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Sweitzer v. MontaninoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API