Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Crider v. Zurich Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 27, 1996No. A96A0308Published

1ConcurrenceBeasley, Chief Judge

I concur fully but wish to distinguish Pate v. Turner County, 162 Ga. App. 463 (291 SE2d 400) (1982), upon which case both appellees rely. The backhoe, which was being operated by a driver on a public roadway for the purpose of transporting a passenger in order for him to accomplish his assigned task, differs significantly from the sanitary landfill compactor in Pate.

The compactor was not designed to haul passengers or freight and the metal wheels required it to be driven on soil or dirt. Unlike the backhoe, it could not be driven on a hard surface such as a road. The backhoe’s four wheels…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. Woodard v. Laurens CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  3. Integon Indemnity Corporation v. Canal Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  4. City of Roswell v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  5. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Whalley Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API