Baumann v. Finish Line, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Before The Finish Line, Inc. hired Tonya Baumann as a consumer-service representative, she signed a contract agreeing to resolve any claims concerning her employment through arbitration. When she was fired six weeks later, she sued in federal court claiming she was discriminated against. The Finish Line moved to compel arbitration and the district court agreed, dismissing Baumann’s complaint. Baumann appeals. Because Baumann agreed to arbitrate her claims against The Finish Line and she has not established that the costs associated with arbitration would be prohibitively high, we affirm.
I
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Ilah M. Tinder v. Pinkerton SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Linda James v. McDonald Corporation, Simon Marketing, Incorporated, and Ante Enterprises Llc, Doing Business as McDonald RestaurantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Eskridge v. Cook CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Standard Bent Glass Corp. v. Glassrobots Oy, a Corporation Registered in FinlandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Johnson v. Orkin, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Sanchez v. CleanNet USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- CLEAROBJECT, INC. v. PAIRED, INC.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2023
- Forte v. Insomnia Cookies, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2023
- Gull v. EstradaDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2022
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.