Legal Opinion

VanElsacker v. Erzberger

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 17, 1984No. Docket 72197PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackenzie, P.J.

Plaintiffs appeal as of right from an order of the circuit court granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment under GCR 1963, 117.2(1). We first note that defendants’ motion was based on the contention that plaintiffs’ suit was barred by a prior judgment, and defendants’ motion referred the trial court to the pleadings of record in that previous action. Therefore, defendants’ motion should have been one for accelerated judgment under GCR 1963, 116.1(5) rather than for summary judgment under GCR 1963, 117.2(1). However, plaintiffs were aware of the basis of defendants’ motion and did not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heikkinen v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. McBride v. ArendsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Badour v. ZifkinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re CarrUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985
  2. Matter of Delex ManagementUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1993
  3. Mazur v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  4. Mazur v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  5. Mazur v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API