Legal Opinion

Apex Energy Solutions of Seattle LLC v. Foit

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided August 9, 2024No. 2:24-cv-00672Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 APEX ENERGY SOLUTIONS OF Case No. C24-00672RSM 10 SEATTLE, LLC, 11 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO Judgement Debtor, REMAND AND FOR ATTORNEY’S 12 FEES PURSUANT

28 U.S.C. § 1447

(C). 13 v. 14 CHRISTOPHER L. HUBBARD, 15 Judgment Creditor and 16 Plaintiff, 17 v. 18 MICHAEL FOIT and PAUL LEWIS, 19 Defendants. 20 21 I. INTRODUCTION 22 This matter comes before the Court on Judgment Creditor and Plaintiff Christopher 23 Hubbard (“Plaintiff”)’s Motion to Remand and for Attorney’s Fees. Dkt. #7. Defendants 24 25 Michael…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Morris Johnson, Jr. v. Columbia Properties Anchorage, Lp, Morris Johnson, Jr. v. Columbia Properties Anchorage, LpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. Mollan v. TorranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1824

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API