Legal Opinion

Arnold v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 7, 2005No. A05A0222PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bernes, Judge.

A Lowndes County jury found George Arnold guilty of selling cocaine in violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act, OCGA § 16-13-30. Raising several enumerations of error, Arnold appeals from his conviction and the denial of his motion for a new trial. Because the trial court committed prejudicial error by removing a juror solely on the ground that he used offensive language during jury deliberations, we hold that Arnold’s conviction must be reversed and that he is entitled to a new trial.

1. Arnold contends that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Hudson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  4. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  5. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  2. Arnold v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. Arnold v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API