Arnold v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bernes, Judge.
A Lowndes County jury found George Arnold guilty of selling cocaine in violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act, OCGA § 16-13-30. Raising several enumerations of error, Arnold appeals from his conviction and the denial of his motion for a new trial. Because the trial court committed prejudicial error by removing a juror solely on the ground that he used offensive language during jury deliberations, we hold that Arnold’s conviction must be reversed and that he is entitled to a new trial.
1. Arnold contends that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hudson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
- Arnold v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Arnold v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005