Legal Opinion

McCann v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 27, 1998No. 96-3596PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge.

We affirm appellant’s conviction of attempting to procure a person under the age of eighteen for prostitution, but remand for correction of the judgment. Of the several issues raised on appeal, we discuss two: the sufficiency of the evidence concerning appellant’s identity as the perpetrator, and the constitutionality of section 796.08, Florida Statutes, (1993).

Appellant contends that the evidence was legally insufficient to identify him as the perpetrator of the offense. The evidence relevant to that issue is stated briefly as follows: Around 8:30 A.M., on…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Trushin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  3. State v. MitroSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  4. Warren v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  5. Melendez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McCann v. MooreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API