Hearst Corp. v. Director of Revenue
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
BILLINGS, Justice.
The narrow issue in this case is limited to taxes paid by Hearst Corporation in connection with the sale of various magazines to Missouri subscribers. Hearst contends that because newspapers are not taxed, *558magazines are entitled to the same exemption. Because the regulations relied upon by the Director to exempt newspapers from sales taxes are inconsistent with any statutory exemption, the regulations cannot stand. Affirmed.
Hearst filed an application for a use tax refund for taxes paid on the sale of various magazines to Missouri subscribers. The Director of Revenue…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Williams v. MarshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- State Ex Rel. State Board of Mediation v. PiggSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Daily Record Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- Bartlett & Co. Grain v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- State Ex Rel. River Corp. v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State ex rel. Missouri Public Defender Commission v. WatersSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- Westwood Country Club v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
- Bridge Data Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
- Teague v. Missouri Gaming CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Lloyd v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.