City of Hastings v. Thorne
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court for Adams county.
1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.
This record shows that a great deal of illegal testi-. mony was admitted on the trial against objection, duly made by the plaintiff in error. Of what this consisted will be apparent from what we shall hereafter say, without now particularizing.
The action in the court below was brought by the defendant in error to recover from the plaintiff in error certain moneys alleged to have been received on account of licenses issued by the corporate authorities for the sale of malt, spirituous, and vinous liquors, within the city of Hastings. The claim to a recovery of these moneys was based upon the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hepburn v. CurtsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838
- City of Tecumseh v. PhillipsNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
- May v. HoldridgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868
- State ex rel. Noonan v. Mayor of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bradshaw v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
- Roose v. PerkinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
- School District v. GassNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
- School District No. 54 of Douglas County v. School District of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
- Fitzgerald v. FitzgeraldNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.